Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83)
Share Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) on FacebookShare Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) on TwitterShare Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) on LinkedinEmail Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) link
Consultation has concluded
We’re seeking feedback on a proposed change to building setback requirements in parts of the Fremantle city centre and the West End Heritage Area. There are no changes proposed to building height requirements.
At present, the City’s Local Planning Scheme No. 4 (planning scheme) requires that all new development above the third storey must be set back ‘out of view’ from the street. We're proposing that the mandatory requirement should be removed for new applications in parts of the Fremantle city centre including the West End Heritage Area, allowing setbacks to be assessed on a case-by-case basis instead.
What is the proposed amendment?
The proposal would remove only one clause from Schedule 7 of Local Planning Scheme No. 4, under sub-section 1.3.1 (page 75). To view the proposed amendment in the scheme text, click here. It does not amend any existing height requirements and would only apply to new development applications.
Under the planning scheme any fourth storey or height above 11 metres would still have to be:
limited to 14 metres in total
consistent with the predominant height pattern of adjoining properties and the locality, and
consistent with any other matters in Council’s local planning policies, including the recently adopted West End Heritage Area Local Planning Policy
Why is this amendment being proposed?
In 2019-20 the City undertook work to develop a new local planning policy (LPP 3.21) for the West End Heritage Area, which has now been adopted. Removing the mandatory setback requirement was considered as part of this work, with some key reasons being:
There may be times where a reduced setback results in a better heritage outcome. Removing the mandatory requirement provides more flexibility to consider this.
Setbacks are not consistent with the traditional building form.
The mandatory setback requirement was originally introduced to reduce the visual impact of upper storeys. The requirement hasn’t always been successful, and we now believe there are better ways to encourage good design under updated policies.
Image 1: On the left, an example of a building with a mandatory fourth-floor setback. On the right, an example of how the traditional built form is setback 'nil' to the street on all levels.
Where would the change apply to?
This change would apply to an area known as sub-Area 1.3.1 shown in the map below (click to open). This includes the West End Heritage Area and much of the city centre.
What we've heard so far
In 2020 we asked the community for feedback on the draft West End Heritage Area Policy and preliminary input on the idea of removing the mandatory setback requirement from the planning scheme. The feedback was mixed:
Some respondents supported the proposed change, reasoning that each application should be considered individually on its merits, and that design should remain sympathetic to the area.
Others didn't support the proposed change or wanted things to 'remain as they are'. Reasons for this included a belief that without guaranteed good design, additions would be better off without street frontage. Other reasons included that it could contribute to bulk in the area and that mandatory setbacks help ensure that heritage features dominate the area.
There was some confusion over the scope of the amendment, with some people interpreting it as a change to building height allowances – this is not the case.
The amendment has been initiated by Council and we're now seeking feedback as part of the formal amendment process.
Share your thoughts below before Wednesday 26 May 2021. You can also post a submission to the City of Fremantle, PO Box 807 Fremantle WA 6959, or contact us for further information.
We’re seeking feedback on a proposed change to building setback requirements in parts of the Fremantle city centre and the West End Heritage Area. There are no changes proposed to building height requirements.
At present, the City’s Local Planning Scheme No. 4 (planning scheme) requires that all new development above the third storey must be set back ‘out of view’ from the street. We're proposing that the mandatory requirement should be removed for new applications in parts of the Fremantle city centre including the West End Heritage Area, allowing setbacks to be assessed on a case-by-case basis instead.
What is the proposed amendment?
The proposal would remove only one clause from Schedule 7 of Local Planning Scheme No. 4, under sub-section 1.3.1 (page 75). To view the proposed amendment in the scheme text, click here. It does not amend any existing height requirements and would only apply to new development applications.
Under the planning scheme any fourth storey or height above 11 metres would still have to be:
limited to 14 metres in total
consistent with the predominant height pattern of adjoining properties and the locality, and
consistent with any other matters in Council’s local planning policies, including the recently adopted West End Heritage Area Local Planning Policy
Why is this amendment being proposed?
In 2019-20 the City undertook work to develop a new local planning policy (LPP 3.21) for the West End Heritage Area, which has now been adopted. Removing the mandatory setback requirement was considered as part of this work, with some key reasons being:
There may be times where a reduced setback results in a better heritage outcome. Removing the mandatory requirement provides more flexibility to consider this.
Setbacks are not consistent with the traditional building form.
The mandatory setback requirement was originally introduced to reduce the visual impact of upper storeys. The requirement hasn’t always been successful, and we now believe there are better ways to encourage good design under updated policies.
Image 1: On the left, an example of a building with a mandatory fourth-floor setback. On the right, an example of how the traditional built form is setback 'nil' to the street on all levels.
Where would the change apply to?
This change would apply to an area known as sub-Area 1.3.1 shown in the map below (click to open). This includes the West End Heritage Area and much of the city centre.
What we've heard so far
In 2020 we asked the community for feedback on the draft West End Heritage Area Policy and preliminary input on the idea of removing the mandatory setback requirement from the planning scheme. The feedback was mixed:
Some respondents supported the proposed change, reasoning that each application should be considered individually on its merits, and that design should remain sympathetic to the area.
Others didn't support the proposed change or wanted things to 'remain as they are'. Reasons for this included a belief that without guaranteed good design, additions would be better off without street frontage. Other reasons included that it could contribute to bulk in the area and that mandatory setbacks help ensure that heritage features dominate the area.
There was some confusion over the scope of the amendment, with some people interpreting it as a change to building height allowances – this is not the case.
The amendment has been initiated by Council and we're now seeking feedback as part of the formal amendment process.
Share your thoughts below before Wednesday 26 May 2021. You can also post a submission to the City of Fremantle, PO Box 807 Fremantle WA 6959, or contact us for further information.
Consider the information provided and type your comments below. You can upload a document if you prefer.
We're required to collect mandatory details from you under the Planning & Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.Identifying information and personal details are not included in public reports.
Consultation has concluded
Share Make a Submission on FacebookShare Make a Submission on TwitterShare Make a Submission on LinkedinEmail Make a Submission link
Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) has finished this stage
August - September 2021
Possible scheme amendment open for comment along with the draft West End Local Planning Policy. The feedback informs an item that will go to Council considering whether to initiate a formal scheme amendment.
Scheme Amendment Initiated
Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) has finished this stage
November 2020
Council resolved to initiate a 'standard' amendment to the City's planning scheme to delete the upper floor setback clause from Sub Area 1.3.1 of the scheme text.
EPA Assessment
Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) has finished this stage
December 2020 - February 2021
The scheme amendment was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) who determined that the proposal did not require assessment under their legislation.
Comment Period
Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) has finished this stage
14 April - 26 May 2021
Feedback on the proposal sought from the community.
Report to Council
Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) has finished this stage
July 2021
A report was prepared on the outcomes of consultation to allow Council to consider submissions received and make a recommendation to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) on whether or not to support the amendment. This was considered by full Council on 28 July 2021. Council decided to recommend to the WAPC that the amendment by modified to maintain the setback requirement for heritage listed buildings, but to allow flexibility for sites not individually listed.
WAPC Consideration and Minister Decision
Changes to Setback Requirements (Local Planning Scheme Amendment No. 83) is currently at this stage
The amendment will be forwarded to the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) for final assessment and a decision from the Minister for Planning. If approved, the amendment then be gazetted and form part of the City's planning scheme.